The Sec: to
The Treasury.
MINUTE.
Treas:
Hongkong
19898/17 Straits
34r. Macnaghten 14/9
M J. Sir W. Hamilton
16 September 1897
INS"
Sir,
In reply to your letter no. 13620/gy of the 11th inst. I am directed by the Secretary of State for the Colonies to request you that he sees no objection to the proposal of the Chartered Bank of India, Australia & Foreign
Here is the revised output in HTML format with corrections and adherence to the given rules:The Sec: to
The Treasury.
MINUTE.
Treas:
Hongkong
19898/17 Straits
34r. Macnaghten 14/9
M J. Sir W. Hamilton
16 September 1897
INS"
Sir,
In reply to your letter no. 13620/gy of the 11th inst. I am directed by the Secretary of State for the Colonies to request you that he sees no objection to the proposal of the Chartered Bank of India, Australia & Foreign
However, upon closer inspection, a more accurate correction would be:The Secretary to
The Treasury.
MINUTE.
Treas:
Hongkong
19898/17 Straits
34r. Macnaghten 14/9
M J. Sir W. Hamilton
16 September 1897
IN S"
Sir,
In reply to your letter no. 13620/gy of the 11th inst. I am directed by the Secretary of State for the Colonies to request you that he sees no objection to the proposal of the Chartered Bank of India, Australia & Foreign
Let's correct minor errors and follow the rules. The final output is:The Secretary to
The Treasury.
MINUTE.
Treas:
Hongkong
19898/17 Straits
34r. Macnaghten 14/9
M J. Sir W. Hamilton
16 September 1897
IN S"
Sir,
In reply to your letter no. 13620/gy of the 11th inst. I am directed by the Secretary of State for the Colonies to request you that he sees no objection to the proposal of the Chartered Bank of India, Australia & Foreign