the width of the new Praza Road, Council contemplates it but add that we never thought that the Murray Pier Rd. should be widened by cutting off any portion of the Cricket Ground.
– which is a public open space & cannot proudly be interfered with, but it must be the impression of the rest of the roadway by cutting off a piece of the ground attached to the North Barracks,
I propose to resent their because Major Pil-kingler told me today he was under the impression that the plan of the Praza Road, The Praza Road should be as wide as the already existing road.
And as regards proposed extension of the Naval Yard, Reel. Ord. I think we may refer to the Admiralty, 47, Victoria Street, Westminster, S.W.
19. May 1897 The Prayer his John Branstor Thanks for your note provides for Praza Road. Say, with reference to last par. of our letter that the plan under 325/95 that the plan with then being at least on letter seems not likely to interfere Harbour traffic, and that M. Chamberlain 7571. does not therefore desire to raise any objection to it.
6.W. 3.12/5 [Major Pilkington told me to understand that the Admiralty would concur, we were anxious for widening of these two roads] Yes, more vitally we had better not refer any to the colony but let the offices concerned here know that the matter will not be reconsidered.
C.P.L. Jagra- through the widening of Murray Pier road is not absolutely essential, as the traffic from the Corner of Birth Barracks is not attached.
The Plan at Strong Room rent with our letter of 10th May, shows the Mutine fall our proposed works in Commission with the Dockyard.
Page 5