present to warrant dismissal. I should let them pass, but not without Graham Macaulay who are not entitled to Pensions who are to retire.
A proposal was made on 25068; Phelps should get a reduced Pension either under the Police Pension Regulations or, if necessary, under the Ordinance of 1862, but the Governor should be told that if he had received bad conduct marks, he must not get more than the Pension he would have earned for 'uniformly good service'.
There is no doubt of great competence tending & comparing beyond all reasonable doubt statements of the same give.
But when it comes to reversing the decision suggested on 25068, I entirely concur with regards to the other men proceeded as proposed on 25068; the Pensions of the men not further implicated should, I think, be reduced 33p.c.
7/12 P.C.M. I would add that I think the delay should not have materially affected the decision which would have been arrived at on 24868, as by the telegram to suspend action alone, without requesting further information. Had it not been for the heavy pressure of work in the Eastern Department during the Autumn, 29868 would have been disposed of.
I rather question whether we could be justified in considering it absolutely conclusive that Sam Gin's list was a correct list so far as it went.