! houses were identical. This evidence supports the gravineness of and statement that I think stingly Sam yiu's document we are now justified 4/ they go ie. in accepting them absolutity so far as conclusive proof that money was paid by the to certain intermediaries on the 26095 and Foord and it cannot I think be 59 that the proprietors of the Gaming House reasonably supposed I could have been cauler enough to allow intermediaries by a pretence of bribery when they money for themselves.
We have dismissed Hore on to cheat there were Keeping purely premmptive the age of actually taking Gambling Have understanding that they should hay it to the Offriers but the widence and * named a pon it. ? E Yeung Kai's wittence deals with Staulon Maker 20054 Quincey, forcoran, Foord, Graham Phelps & Mucauley. of there Stanton, Baker & Quincey (who were on duty near Wa Lave, have already been (see 22025) for gross neglect of duty. Liinuised
As regards forcoran and Foord there is I thich it to warrant dismissal without wiidence enough Pension. In each of there mens cases Yeung Kai's widence strongly substantiates Sam yui's. Briber - hassed though his hands on the way to forcoran bribes sum to me to have beew law strong against Osmund than in either of alove· naiud cares.
2 Dismiss forcoran and Forld. 9 the
As regards Graham, Phelps & Macauly the is less string; Yeung Kai fresh Widen ee was merely told by Lam Chi the huper House that certain other of the Gaming intermediaries curried bribes to thee. There is therefre hardly evidence enough at