me
or
six
one year
fine [amount]
Order vez enferieomment by
[instead of not specified for both.]
[As to this prompt]
I cannot understand
the statement in par. 3(2)
W.O.
generally
terms of draft to be that the local laws are
General
7907191
stringent. The exact efforts
seem to me to be the case,
points out in his minute on
Me Lucas Wing freed
Exy McAdriana 21222/96]
Aug. 10/11
11/11
I agree: if the W.O wishes things to
remain as they are,
of ar
then the introduction of amended Official Secret Act
Act, it will be better not to tinker the Hong Kong Ordinance. It is curious that the Official Secret Act does not provide for the amount of the fine (para. 216).
I feel some Act does not
14 15
Sir,
dub[l]e to whether the Imperial [legislation] over-rides all...
to deal with interior offences identical to this con before a officer for the eight deadly offences
in the disregalathe
it
When
ative, until the Imperial Act (or the requisite parts of it) has been suspended by
under
but perhaps it is point, and
With
the Imperial &
Capes.
2
Loc.
2 Proceed
may
I write this minute before serving the Los hunion in the
1871 (9558/92) another paper the same salch
5 (see Wadrian's minute) mauritiusord
on 21
to raise
2127726
if
a cendry
will proceed
local acts were concurrents
the former for the
more serum
suggested by her Johnson
AFG M Wingfield"
ague. See also minute on 22112
down to "about.
Proceed as prepared
12
te
this kind should be upon the questions
to lust
(12626/59) now
Achched to taban
WFW 12/
Wo 2/2.22
9 BV J7 283
Government House, Hongkong, 6 October, 1897.
With reference to
your despatch No. 218 of the 16th October, 1896, and to previous correspondence, I have the honour to submit for
the Right Honourable Joseph Chamberlain, M.P.,
Ja your!