holds the appt of Inspector of Schools won is under no consideration to be appointed an Examiner: I do not think this for interference was intended & I see no reason ? So refly & with regard to his memoure of Fely '96 (enclosed by your in 1905, which was overlooked when the reply by all oversight Laks drafted) express regret at the terme was given hien hat say A that no definite reply the pomit's raised by hiem were carefully sufficient considered and interfering- that the Sof I saw no reason for
`These papers have been delayed about a fortingbet ouring I thick Hua 6 the 94 papers being in circulation, so our reply should go by Friday's mail. I send on the papers in greew. I T.C.M 8/1/97
DiLrigen seans inneerponing prone to take offence where no is intended. Icestaring in the depratade om 4799/94 Ihanan vesang that need fresh the depects o 120 Schools, because he is Lupescton Coccasionally of seberts, from being employed as an Exammier agone cloe- ay more than in seems much there been citauder that the college should be withdrawn from & perive} his regular [supermitendence. Sorld thrupne reply a proposed, on the role т but as Du Crigern appears to be a good waster, & the College appears ther peopered conden on might premacher something of the effect that her. Chamberlain feals competin that no reflection upon Liin her been intended the apps Ww.Mewin Examnen,