344
of the fact & told him to bring
the man to
my office the fol-
lowing day.
This Inspector Stanton
did, and
I think in the In-
spector's presence, who acted
as Interpreter, took a state
ment from Ise Linng
(who
identified 7 of the packages of Jewellery
as
his property)
containing the salient points of the evidence which he
gave before the Magistrate.
Be Leving however, who was evidently much discom-
posed, ended in
an
answer
to a question from me,
this his first statement
with the sentence "I never
saw any loui visiting"
No3. East Street I do not
paid to the Police
know whether
any thing
-73-
1
The following day
I went
to
my
private house when, with Mr
Brewin who had in the
meantime translated this
so-called incriminatory
of
the papers which I had en-
trusted to him, I showed
him the paper marked List
III The thereupon made the
are placed these documents
the
nish to party
the tourin
statement marked Exhibit (F) which it will be observed
is very different in its tenor
concerning
the complicity
of the police to what he
had told me in the presence
of Inspector Stanton.
144