525
ufficient details to enable the Police to identify the person whose extradition is desired and specify the extradition crime alleged / see Schedule to Ordi= -nance 26 of 1889).
With respect to the other
proposals embodied in your Memeoran,
-dune.
0
am to state that
fat It is not deemed advisable
to enact that neither the accused nor the Chinese Government should be represent. -ed by lawyers at the preliminary in= - vestigation. So far as expense is
is con:
to understand.
-cerned Fam
given that at least one local firm of Solicitors would be prepared to act for the Chinese Government, if retained, in all extradi- -ton cases for a lump sume
of $150
A case.
If such local legal assistance is obtained here would appear to be little probability of rendition being refused solely on technical points of procedure.
น
161
1)
(b) There seans to be no sufficiens.
for relegating
rendition Codes
to the Registar General to investigate instead of to the Magistrate. There are
grave objection to such a course and
arguments
As adduced in
the
its adoption would
appley
for
ee to nearly
support of
with equal
all caves in this Colony
ni which Ohmeve are concerned.
10. The Excellency
the
Governor
regrets that he cannot meet the wishes of the Viceroy with respect to the proposed prode
uction, under certain quarantees,
of natives whose evidence is; quiré
to add that it pending.
•
has been suggested that deposition taken in China might be accessed in evidence of alleged murder, manslaughter, piracy, burglary, howe-breaking
ei caves
robbery with violence where the neared had not resided in the Evony
more Khaw
six months and provided that such de= positions
are taken in the presence of the
Brit
ཆལྟ་