& interviewing Mr. Gundry the writer

this letter & hon. See:

the

China Association on these points.

He called here two days

ago about

that’s letter

J

CPd

3. Feb.

4.J

representations.

? Reply that in consequence of representations made to test the Frey offer of the British Minister at Peking, and the British

Consul at Chefoo 4. The dangerous wireworking

employing shaperzon from Chefoo

The Governor of Hongkong was instructed in each in 1895 van after consultation with this Consuls at the Treaty Ports to cause to be prepared and subject to the Secretary of State for approval the British Yang Ordinance establishing regulations, less stringent than those in force under er ein

Fing Ms 5 shef

more than 7 days duration,

for Chefoo passenger ships than 7 days duration

Las

anggis z

The Governor has but yet submitted the draft

fine details

when he has to bring

China legislation will include due consideration I would not discuss at present with in handling

gan kepribele inter lapper we got

dis M Robinson will no doubt have due considered the suggestions of the Consul at Canton as well as then the their Consuls whom he has no doubt consulted

the bud Dust Att

it is probably the opposition of the Brick theperonin which has delayed his action

Ew 7610

sir,

0.0.

2432

REGE | FEB 30,

CHINA ASSOCIATION,

31, Lombard Street, LONDON, E.C.,

31st January, 1896.

1339

I have the honour to submit for your favourable consideration a letter from the Shanghai branch of the China

Association, protesting against certain restrictions which

the Government of Hong Kong contemplates imposing by Ordinance

on the carriage of passengers in British ships on the China

coast.

The Hong Kong branch of the Association has telegraphed

endorsing this protest, and the General Committee desire to

express entire accord with views which they believe to be

shared by Her Majesty's Consuls in China.

Power to legislate by Ordinance for the control of British

Shipping in Chinese waters was conferred on the Hong Kong

Government by what is commonly known as the Chinese Passenger

Act of 1855. The convenience of centering such action in a

Local Authority was obvious, and the local knowledge possessed

by unofficial members of the Legislative Council might ensure

consideration being paid to local conditions. A further check

128,

moreover, provided by the obligation to submit all Ordinances for confirmation by the Imperial Government before they

become law.

The chief objects of the Chinese Passenger Act appear to

have been to prevent abuse of Chinese emigration to distant

countries, and to provide for the safety of passengers.

The Right Honourable J. Chamberlain, M.P.,

H.M. Secretary of State for the Colonies.

It

1

Share This Page