I have granted this (the petitioner's brother.. privilege 7. a
Hazeland,
E
the strength
of a newspaper paragraph 4the affect that in
dealing with certain
similar cases at the
Straits Settlements The Lea?
of State hard
into
declined to enter, the question of domicile
of officials of rank", I am surprised that
I hav
regarded
←
3.
newspaper A report
I was surely not of that kind
authority,
base
A
L
sufficient
which to
reversal of at
decision previously
arrived at in W.7.a.
Hazeland's case, as reported in your
the
251th
despt no. 326 of 12
Nov. 1895, & approved.
desp" no. 309
20th Dec. 1895%. Moreover
and
B. The statement
in my
expressly
negatived them
idea of making
a distinction between
officers in different the service & rantes of the
was
beerd incorect,
despatch
the d
Lew
allowed then
for
Dec.
The for!
The Straits Settlements, which best grant of exchange compensation
fir W.H.d.
& Man With Cox & to ZW.
Conthening Anthonisz,
laid down
flan
The Sam
as was
were identical with quiding principle
given given to gon in par
th
3 of my predecessor's despt u. 72 of 27 March 1895, namely that the officema
riginally domiciled in a gold
standard country
might lin