witnesses who their examined have the $.... Evidence on understanding that it should not be published in the Colony. Me Evidence accompanying was therefore the Reporting his chape in this shake not printed in the recent Parliamentary Pape on the outfect of the Trade of the British Empire [C-8449] contain present engaging M= Chamberlain's affention thereplies desp town with the form of fedth Hov. but Memorandum, (p.324-331) sum – marizing the Evidence. abated (see ppen 324-337).
3. Iam to request you to draw the attentio the Board to the follow weather referent in the E
This matter is at I have spoken to CPF Mi- Harris & he agrees to there points being omitted. Ford Selborne will furbably object to our not dairy so CP.C
Endence:
(a) fatte action Steamer "Conference then 332 raising & keeping uch the freights from British ports (see pp. 21-2, 79%. delsewhere);
(b) the restrictions Chinese passenger traffic beaming British vessel (nee pp. 51,76-8), which outject Jam to refer t letter (M.9010) of 2nd June 1896 and & the letter from this Dept of 8th Jame 1896;
(c) the infring hademaster, confare (pp. 47-8 with 1 55);
(d) the offfect of the Dranch differential tariffs (see Mp. 74 +92-3);
(c) the complaint (atspp. 786) That