Sunny Tham
I ham together under the heads of the
Conmuoditer's
30
fome
a memorand mar
of information which will be practically
The
pooling
they
those which we
have verwind for the Clones: A mittle quite informal.
It has kan suggested to me that evidence given under the pledge of secrecy is withless. I do not think so. Ce pemoal of the Eviding its occasumal contradictions
(
As Constant
Vanctions of the same fails, testify to
gemme
character and I think
my propword treatment of it will put Sing Kare precisely the same this
20 am
then Colony which has ansured.
Tschaps 5 copies of the full paper
might se
6 the Br of Pake the Kapi
as a confidential paper.
Apart from the mais question? hould call attention to the following passages o matters in the Evidence,
The
chist of which are also alluded to
in the Committee's cepation
(c) the action of
Sleaners
The "Conference "327 sarining & Keeping up the fright for British porti - pression, but particularly pp 21-2 and
79 Igles
This is a matter theils with Come
up for future considnation indir Me Jinsial qurdhuinn of freqble.
(b) the restrictine's on Chinese pussugs. traffic
Kamig
ch
24/pp. 76-8, p. 51 and
25230,
a
chave had
Mr. 610
this question
tiona te time dhen
ence of a (ustan
Ja
ree at
ms some difficulty the wow of expany Hi fraudulent
Jug 18/11
48889-3000-7-94
British Vissili.
In the: I have cumulated separately lates drop. from the Gouren.
(e) the infringement of trademarks. of. pp. 47-8 with p. 5 We can Evidiutty
557
to Moralacton lave Me to Veral action
(1) the effect of the Franch differential
pp. 74
tauffs. 198
(8) the policy of getting
92.3.
mere " Inaty potty
344 p. 85 but contrast p. 11.
(f) the complaint ash-nagtact by
the Batich foot in making a treat, with Japan.
If you agre
sra p. 75.
By full report
to sending this to the
93d of trade, then attention mof it i
Here is the corrected version in HTML format as requested:I ham together under the heads of the
becomesI have put together under the heads of the
Here is the full response with all corrections.Sunny Tham
I have put together under the heads of the
Committee's
30
some
a memorandum
of information which will be practically
The
pooling
they
those which we
have obtained for the Colonies: A minute quite informal.
It has been suggested to me that evidence given under the pledge of secrecy is worthless. I do not think so. The perusal of the Evidence, its occasional contradictions
(as Constant
Variations of the same facts, testify to
genuine
character and I think
my proper treatment of it will put Singapore precisely on the same footing as
20 am
the Colony which has assured.
Perhaps 5 copies of the full paper
might be
sent to the Br of Trade the Kapi
as a confidential paper.
Apart from the main question, I should call attention to the following passages on matters in the Evidence,
The
chief of which are also alluded to
in the Committee's report
(c) the action of
Cleaners
The "Conference "327 relating & Keeping up the fight for British porti - pression, but particularly pp 21-2 and
79 Igles
This is a matter that will come
up for future consideration under Me Judicial qurdhuinn of freqble.
(b) the restrictions on Chinese passengers. traffic
Kamig
ch
24/pp. 76-8, p. 51 and
25,30,
a
clause had
Mr. 610
this question
tiona te time when
ence of a (ustan
Ja
ree at
ms some difficulty the way of expany Hi fraudulent
Jug 18/11
48889-3000-7-94
British Vessel.
In the: I have cumulated separately latest drop. from the Govern.
(e) the infringement of trademarks. cf. pp. 47-8 with p. 5 We can Evidently
557
to Moral action have Me to Verbal action
(1) the effect of the French differential
pp. 74
tariffs. 198
(8) the policy of getting
92.3.
mere " In duty portly
344 p. 85 but contrast p. 11.
(f) the complaint against act by
the British Govt in making a treaty with Japan.
If you agree
see p. 75.
By full report
to sending this to the
Board of Trade, then attention must be paid to it