i
4
our opinion.
(6) The Head Master comments on
"The undue length of the papers far exceeding previore years, for which csufficient time was allowed." In
many was allowed. Only
Chwa
longer time than usual
Nice
there
any
sign of complaint during the examinis . tion that the time was insufficient, and then the examiners offered to take the suéject again giving
enquiry, paper, but the stead Master, on unconditionally withdraw the
complaint
another.
and expressed himself as quite satisfied.
siways open to the Masters in
If war
charge of classes, and to the Head Master
to whom copies of the papers were sent
and
They
were given
given out, to ash
for a
longer time than that allowed, or to
many
201
2. (3)
uw=
comment upon them. In tances we asked the Assistant Masters.
if the time was sufficient, and we
assured were worst that it was. the noheed,
fov,
too, that most of the bays had com.
pleted their work long before the time. for collecting the papers.
(c) The stead Master
421
Zahe
there
was a want in several instances of surection of plain simple English in
"The questions? To his we would
remark that in several instances the Chinese Masters were asked to make
any points clear to the pupils, which in their opinion might be obscure by reason of wording;
the
while it wer
greokreslut,
open for them to do so to a if they had thought it necessary act permission to do 20. Perhaps,
Head Master was
10
on the
generally in his Office at the time of the Examination he
was not aware that ther
were offered.
opportunities
(d) " The giving of alternative
- questions, complained of is recognised
in certain subjects
a
fair method becoming comme
in
of examining, and is