that European descent must to construed
I mean having and an uncaster hawers umeto
European race -
J
But I greatly prefer the Pollocker drape
is ko
I think with Meshoom that there objection to letting a persing a race or relerin wheil allows polygamy – his kincself or herself. under a different law and by anising contracting under its depréir himself or hurly.
а жилище
of the privilege of polygamy -
bas I perated out in my minute the law already does this
j
m 15011
the polygames. Xtian and I don't see why the same effet thould but he given to his wher
persa mairies a
mancap
arcage with
a non. Xtla
a
out I think theme thould ho
Murting any one
A
Movis com
who is already lyally marine
aunding to the law his religion from contracting
a
1
1
marrige under the adrianer-
EN 21 Muk
Дария
S
24/3
W. Wingfield
the 24/3
If M. Pollock's Soft ad approved, Jam afraid that his draft Prdinance may require further amendment begond the point referred to at end of your minute. For, undir Ord. 14 of 187:
as amended by his Draft
Ordinance, would it not be compulsory in all marriages to give notice to the Registian (under 5. 8 of the Ordinates), and further to comply with them provisions specified in s. 29 in order to secure validity?
Perhaps the difficulty would be met, by not repeating 39 of Ord. 14 of 1875, Madding Somewhat to the following Effect:
S. 3
but
to that section words.
" provided that other persons who are not already legally married according to the law of their religion and whene neither of the ties has an undivorced husband or wife
be married in
living may
the marr
prescribed in
5. 24 of this Ordinanc
and then gom
with .3
W. Pollock's draft
theesh
3 of
8u925/3
I think that the following words
We Pollock's draft
addið K clause 2
<
27
in but shall Except marriages belivin persons neither y whom professes the Christian ry religion duly celebrated according the norent law and religion of the parties
and the words 'husband' and wither as used in this action shall to include potention persux