was that of the Pregistres of the Supreme Court (but Akroyd) which was raised from $5020 to #6480 1.e. by 29th percent
Amongon the offerer of articl the Salaves were not so micreased was that of the Puione Judge which was raced from #8760 to only $84,00 Lic. by only 2.9 per ceas
alish officer entitled to the 4/2 rate of converce was published 21 May 1892, and from this list Mr Akroyd
his salarig Register having been increased by at least 14 percent in fact by 29 percent
was excluded
at
Baton
J
the 7th Jum 1892 mer Akroyd was promoted tobe Puime Judge, the salary
had not beeld of which office increased by more than 219 2 July 1892 a new list of officers was published in the Colony of officers entitled to the 4/2 rate of conversions in which his name was included:
per cous, and on 2.
173
This shows the views taken by the Colonial government but (for the reason wheel I have given above) I think
it
was an erroneous view
and (whether for that orfor her reasons) we directed, properly I think that his name should be removed from the list
Agarios the Mr Akroyd. appenes on the ground that the office of Puerne Judge was not in June 1890 brought under the new zace, but although it was not brought under The new sale at that moment I think it was obviously intended to do so on
the occurrence
of a vacancy and I therefor Thuils his pension Shaned be paid at the rate of 3/8 Nr. 26/6/95 Shortly P.S. apertura kroyds promotion