the views su
subject
to the
Stuntary of
of State. I think
advaning.
M:
het
Some fuck bond on the subject could for an Personally the impression I have formed", that 2:
Ackroyd
on
paper
has not a valid claim in equity". he has a
strong dundantly labour under
will ein
case, & if refused
a
C.P.L. 24 June
he
1 great sense of injustice
Sin R. Mende
Art In Elden & actitate
Esh
24.6.95
By all mea
Rue 24/6
The question troms upon the constivation to be placed upon the of the paragraph of Lord Kuntofords despatele 110 of The 19 June 1890. Jensions were to be haid at 3/8 per dollar in the following cases (1) holders of offices of which the Salaries were then increased by a fo least 14 per cent (2) persons promoted to offices of which the salaries wer
werk
)
then so micreased (3) all new
apponilments
172
It was not explicitly
stated that the race was to
to persons promoted apply
to offices of which the salaries were not so mcreased, but it was said (and mr Akrago Takes no notice of this) "such on the other hand as officers. "Now receive no increase or an "increase of less than 14 percent
Dire
" to their present emoluments " will continue to be entitled 4 to the 4/2 rate of exchange for "leave salaries & pensions to "Yons they hold their present
appointments on the same sacarin which I thuch obviously implies the intention that their succepors in the same apponitiments of the The same Salaries, whethear appointed from outside the Hangtoons service or promoted from within it, should be placed under the new rule
асединяет нежели
Amongst the offices
of which the salaries were then increased by at least 14 kencant