the Legislature to do so in Committe
the Bill. The verbiage of Ardi =
MAI Ced
of this kind
Loved and inn
improved
may often be
my
our case I
always glad of any suggestions
of that bind and always attend to them. I do not, however, consider
to have sufficient weight to ponder it necessary to refuse assent
the
objection
to the Ordinance.
I believe the real reason for a
few people owning private carriages " objecting
to the Ordinance was that they thought they would have to have the number of the licence printed. carriage. At all events one
sed on the on
gen-Kaman
told me so and when I showed him.
the Regulations only required
ber
for
trade and livery
a nur1 =
vehicles be
seemed perfectly satisfied. It would be competent for the Governor in Council to exempt private carriages from the operation of the Ordinance
(oce
#
朋
f
490
(see Section 2) but I do not recomme this is
they, like other vehicles, ought to be subject to traffic regulations. In deed to do so would free them promi the " Rule of the Road Regulation; Government Notification N1⁄2 369 of 25 August, 1895. See Gazette for 31th August 1895, page 991.
6th September, 1895.
"Whitleigh Goodman, Attorney General.