!
15
England & who, he also
says.
had
a good opinion
him; but I do not see any use in inviting
fartha opinions.
Whany
moreover was always
of
"falling out with 2: Ayres and may at f "Contradiction, give the topposite opinion to di
is about 2: Marquez
my
minute on
Ayusin
1 The difficulty pension. Please see
10977:
I cannot find that he was ever
Eftinduct
a popor of
formally appointed.
with one set of
laten
ujant
him
খ
not 55 compulsorily retire him on the ordinary terms without abolition allowance on the ground that the service
has not been Wholly satisfactory
of that his position is not quite?
C.PL 14. August
Der Reverend
Hear
homes it not be preferath to que lim
abolition lenus and then reduce the pension
Gut he was entrusted, as this
under instructions from the Secretary of State Cammoth
duties and another, so I
think he must be taken to be permanently employed and pensionable. He states int
his evidence that he has no
The
private practice ?!.
the car the difficulty in about the pension. If
Alt is treated das abolition of office,
should in the
addition n 5
do not think we
2
he
Couse "receive an
ordinary if not
・gibe
can
27. year.
a min whom we want to
but I
these terms to
get rid of & whose peuximable position
for incompetency is not quite clear. Only suggest exceptionalley and - assuming
I can
that we treat the case
that he is
All Ind
on the Gromeed of inefficiency
aadein bucentage
M= Fairfield
I have laid recently
on a paper about St Ayres that I did not think the 12th main section of the Irska, Pension Regulation, come uplatin an abstition allowance, cxcept in cases of bona fide abolition
of ere to the port; & think it would be an pretend to
veorgan setion of abuse tasaseley it in a case of this kind where
I can see, there are bobe no fewer doela, them
far
Play2
A