M. Fanfield
There must be a mistake in the Paper of Particulars, in making the salary rise from 1600 by 1825 annually to #900, for that would take 12 gear to reach the maxumiin, whereas the desp" says the increments
implying Extend over -five years,
that the maximum is reached in
that period.
Engaged
was Engas
Wardmaster Brett was
(see 10331/93) on #4480 risingly
$24 to $600,
包
Halted but his salarz
bec. of
by $120 when he beganne
was increased sole
Wardmaster (see [ 1265793-4) - thum the pay 1600 rising by making the pay 1424 annually to # 1720.
Shall we accept the proposal to let the pay rise from 14600 to 1900 totam in five years,
I mak
X These ar Xthe mistrem
received No Assiste Apothecar the Stewa at the Horsin
the increments accordingly $60. a year instead of $25?"
Ishould have thought it would have been better not to continue (4.3307 Est this Wardmaster at all, but to
Emploza larz Nurse instead, according
apkinmin
to D. C
vaginal proposal
der
He will hit we
first page of Enc. in 1265/93-43.
should I suppose accept the present proposals of
regards that point?
the for a 583
2
Jus. & may
atmush.
2 Maz