and this vid base made it clear,
con
sickr aliw, that no 10 per cent for co pulsory taking
163
was to be awarded.
The Taipingshare and:-
naved by section 30 made provision for extending its application to the case of certain other anwes if they should be resumed by the Crown but it made no such provision in of houver only temporarily closed by the Sanitary Board.
the case.
14.
property
h
or vers
my opinion unless
are made by tourps-
rary loss or dusiminution of rents to feel that it is to their advantage to take some interest in the sanitary condition of their :property it will be impossible trade_ quately deal with the sanitary pro-
blem. I observe that while the owners.
were carefully protected from much loss by section 13 of the Jaipurigohan Resumption Ordinance kere two "no com. pensation shall be given clauses, in
#
Sechon
It
396
Section 14 are confined to claims for
compensation by "sub- lessees or tenants one that of the whole or any portion of any
Recons
{ me or
house Je, ge; and the Memorialiste.
In last
Cause of My
3
do not seem at all distressed at the to
levar losses occasioned to many miserably.
1
j
of poor, ignorant rent paying tenants
we fut whose furniture and fittings and art cles were destroyed by reason of clean-
Jug
ang
ØY
divinfecting operations, (See
Sect. 14 Arder 8 of 1894).
15
As the "Closed houses and
insanitary dwellings Ordinance 187/4 was passed
on the 29th December and were admittedly properly
its provisions
the loss
required for sanitary reasons, sustained by property owners who re- fused to comply with the Board's re- quirements must have been very ourall, for the houses could not have been occupied after 29th December until the ground surface had been covered with impervious material to
the