are in leave, I Consider that they should not be counted
for the purpose of exchange compensation, but should be expressly
together sexcluded ag with any other allowance,
Similar to those which are excluded by the first part of par
121
Enclosed
the Shift rules dated 20th Nov. last
^
6. In reply to zem dest no. 51 of the 19
I
A John ultimo, have to inform zun that the allowan should not be given to officers serving in purely temporary capacity agreement,
th
M
C
190
who
8.9. to Enguicers are sent out & for
particular work
Who
20
Freturn home when that work is finished, ordinarily to officers paid out of an open
vote, but when it is intended to retain
officer permanently This service is satisfacting, twhen there for his agreement for (say) three years, though nominally temporary is likes to
preliminary to be made perman
Employment,
ཡན་འ ཞ་ཆ ོས་
I am
of opinion that in
such a
Case
matter
of grace though not
J
O
matter of right,
for privilege of range
Exchange.
Feb.