advantage
in
~ 1893 in which
taken
of this exemption. I have
not get received a similar
report
ALY
working
1894
of the Ordinance in
but unless the exemptions
in that year were much
more numer
in
than
I
the previous zear,
cannot see
sufficient
that any
reason existo
Regulations
for altering the stor on the subject of 31th October 1893 which were adopted
after full common, at the Exemptio
was inginally suggested at the
the Perinsular
I request of
Narration
& Oriental Steamships (0)
as you
my
breme
informed in
desh" no. 135 of 31st
August 1893.
3. I take this opportmich
of informing zou
that the
Mail Contracts of the
Messageries Maritimes
71
I the North German Lloyd
Steamers, ex
isting at the
date of the above
mentimed Regulations,
July
were to expire in 1903
July
h
1900 respectively. Ini the Messagerie
the case
B
Maritimes the time was extended, ly a subsequent supplementary contract to July 1912, but the exemption allowed to this Company's
under the Hongthing Steamers, would
Regulations
not extend beyond the
year 1903.
+
!