tenants
the Landlord who might that be punished for the conduct of
over whom he had no
control, but ar
any
the A. Col. Lecretary pointed out Landlord, who showed that he did his
best to prevent the offence, would probably not tapanabend have his house
closed
at
any
rate not fora
long period.
? Sanctim the Ordinance,
as at A above
and remarking inregard to s. 10
Jah [ The delay
f.W.7.1573 C.P.2.15
in sending
on this paper
I hoped to deal with it
is due to me. I
but could not get time?
Sanchin the Ordinance. I would not write as at A: -
The Chinese househollen will, worn with this power of inspectin,
be very diffimes to Rufin order: de
I would
mly
Will the forem &
report wery six months as to the working of this deckin & wheth
aug complaints an mad-
against its operation.
97829-2
11257/3
So proceed. But lite the God. Meat he should proceed many cautiously in he subrcise of the power imfired by the Ordinance - (mamen
to deal wit
are
He is a
difficult people telegram
Worthing
strike arising
น
Hong Kong spintay
sanitary repuer
mary
27
N6-
REC
C.O.
2509
Ree 9 VEB 90)
Government House,
HongKong, January, 1895.
My Lord Marquess,
I have the honour to transmit for the signification of Her Majesty's pleasure the
following Ordinance entitled:_
The Right Honourable The Marquess of Ripon, M.G.,
да
Jo
"An
Page 30Page 31