}
5.10 As to domiciliary visits of any
house at any time of day dwelling night is the most serious clause in the & I do not wonder that or behalf of the Chinese objected
Ordinance, Ho Kai
to this clause.
marked passage
In for. promised, (see
last page of inc?) to arantee that there visits
tab guarant
should be regulated with the very greatest
Care
In app the old Ord. 24 of 1887, this was limited (5.69) general Inspection to Common Lodging Houses, but 5.70 provided that whenever any
building
wan
found to be in an
Domestic
overcrowded
"condition "the Magistrate might make an order for the abatement.
of the misance,
& might also order it to be under inspection the night & day for the period
at any
of one
home off
Hence
one month. But of course the difficult is to first find that the house is overcrowded unless inspection is allowedgenerally. the provision for such universal inspection ein Hangkang. necessity, but is so it is a very objectionable necessity.
almost to be a
? As regards this clause, say that befent Considering whether it can be allowed to remain in operation in its present form, Lord Riseen wishes to know precisely precautions the for. proposes to take to prevent it's abuse
5.12(a) in
(see
what
a concession to the Unofficials last Enc. ) & dam rather sorry that
made. But I
Mis concession was
suppose we may accept it?
I would l
it be emai
a then ask
as
sugge
Midia
yes COPE
c
5.16 was
hotly opposed by thee
Unofficials, who argued that the
the houses in question
should receive some compensation,
26
onmers
of
the owners
in the same way
of
are t
property in Taipingshan who
be dispossessed under Ord. 80/1894, (see 18871/94). But they ignored the fact
of Ord. 8 of 1894 that under 5. 130 Ord. 8
in
clans for compensation determining arex be made in respect
deductions
of the age
в
character insanitary condition
"to of the houses" and under 5. 14 of
that Ardee no
Jamzed
compensation is to be given for fittings to removed the plague & in operations for cleansing
disinfecting,
ov
is to be given.
a portion of a hons Sched
d that no
compensation
feet fany
house
unfit from any cause for hum habitation
This last provision
covers the houses dealt with under
Ordinance, & the owners
the present Ordinance,
д
A
A
ouch houses ought swabby to pay fine to the community, rather than to expect to get any compensation for loss of rent on
The Lor fully justified
compulsory closing.
I think
I was thereforr
This J. 16?
5.17
to
in not giving
way
ver
closing of insanitary well or willi" like I to prove injurions health " was also opposed, but it should I think be approved. 5. (c) was opposed, as being
19
Te
hardon