4
(1) by the omission of
5. 2, since there is no need to cut out the
definition of
of a trothed "Contained
in the Ordinance of
1888;
(2) and mitead of 5.4,
I think it better that
a section should be
introduced, repealing 5.14 and
subsection (2) of 5.12
the Ordinance of
1888,
and amending
5.13of
that Ordinance
by niserting at the and of subsection (1) the word,, "and also " if so required by the
" Protector to produce
[This agree
with what is said in
draft to
Hangkey]
Cur
A
In first subsection
L
Such wanan
or girl
27
"in the absence of
"reasmable Excuse
proof whereof shall
"lie
1 My
the axensed"
rearmı
for
suggesting the repeal of obsection (2) of
5.12 of the Order of 1888 is because it
confers powers which
seem
tome
capable
of rescate serious
abuse b
the Inspector,
and Andeconst affor
is this direction.
them
appears to provide probe required for
purpose of resening
all that is
women confined against their will.
7. Irequest zu.
Page 30Page 31