amendment in 5.25
A
of the principe Ord. 11 1890, provided by 5.20% the Draft Ordinance.
is not in any Jimin suficient. It will be
better to repeal 5.25
1890
of the the Ordinance (tho amend 5.24, by assisting eathing fart that
thin
Is inserting after the
ü
→
form of which a
unsuitable to the
altered circumstances,
words "being inquired into","
namely,
the following wor; v
"I who without reasonable
"Exense (proof whereof shall
lie
G
the accused) neglects
" a refuses to produce
"Such wi
girl,
"when so required by "The Registion fine
8. It is absurd
[N.B.
to impose a dut
tothel.krepn
when we do nota by recognize is Siddin legal positiv
Mr.
#
Mr.
DRAFT.
MINUTE.
Mr. Fairfield.
Mr. Wingfield.
Mr. Bramston.
Mr. Meade.
Mr. Buxton.
Marquess of Ripon.
Fought 7. With regard to the
Statement made
20
He Memorandum of
the D's & Watchemse
Committee, that when
Wothels cease to be
the regulatsch, & they
Brothelsirabolished "will be scat in all
"over the (olny to thin "annozance of respectable " families," I would point out that thes places could then be proceeded agamist under 5.5 of 25 Seo. II. (.36, which Act is applied to Hongthing by 5.7 of Ord. 12 of 1873; but proceedings
under
that Act would be
a countions d'inconvenient,
&