1
AF
(10)
650
ror has it any legal or referriole bearing or relevancy to the claim for payment of compensation for removal and re-erection laid away, under No 7 of 1893, is
Shall
inly
Z
such Compensates.
be paid after the work of Reclamation shall actually have been commenced
of the said Marmi cor-like
in' uôd i
Sub-section A and
Orämance
with Section &
B.
F
ac claca
And further,
compelled to
and disagree that
the whole
*
of the Pier
I reper Eram
most emphatically repudiate
น
of the Construction
"of the works
the Reclamation;
"rendered quite useless for the
purpose for which it
"and has since had no earning
"power whatever as
no steamers
Cau