ding in which Mr Nicolle complains that only $106.09 has been recovered out of $7,532.53
and be
of the account.
gives a copy
The account is perfectly
correct and I
am quite sure
that the Registrar
would not
have passed the same, unless satisfied on
all points. There has been nothing
to show that Mr Sangster
leched My
49.
v cvl.
could have collected.
Under these circumstances
and after these explanations I would respectfully submit that there is no Justice to Mr. complaint
CALY
Wise that
LLO
now be made
against his audit, and even taking the whole of Mr Nicollé's
statements.
they stand they
show at most only
a
few irre
gularities
142
irregularities necessarily attendant on a new
system and that no important mistake or error has been pointed out or discovered.
With respect to the fees allowed to the Officer appointed
Afficial receiver I know that
the matter
was well considered
while the Ordinance was in
preparation.
It was not then
known who
would be appointed and it was
thought that payment by fees and a
percentage
on the
amount collected, would
be the best plan.
Instead the despatch and
correspondence now mentioned
have been referred to
200
/
doubt that sys-
ayu-
terre would not have been
recommended.
51.