An argument that entertainment allowance is a grant for a specific purpose, and exerting, James observes the rule. Although there is no necessity and wisdom in it, it would be invidious for the Treasurer to demand a certificate stating that the service for which the statute is made has been duly performed, especially when, as in the present case, it has been deliberately decided that money has been spent fully on the matters for which it is granted, and it should be understood that the bill has not been made fraudulent.
It is clear that the duty has been performed, and the entertainment has been carried out fully. I am of the opinion that there can be no doubt that neither the B.A.G. nor the S.V.G. should receive the money, but that it should be allowed to lapse to the Treasury. I have...
Page 405