from contributing & Meri fund
3 N
Moposal organa tention
sch furthe Expressed in
... рабиной
Sup No 110 of the 19th
to the effect
of me 1890 was that!
A
then offer whom sclaves
का
on the
should I increased 20
Scalate
per cant should I com
felled,
an a condition of receiving
that increase, to contribute
to the Fund, not that then Swart offiin toif 290/00
wen to be microwd (35 per cook should be allowed
to contribute their
OV
not at
the officers Valerady in the
[vice
it is true
Paragraple of my Hup M231
لله
340
Nr 23 w 1 Sept rögz
though not all appointed pomme Eyland
So far as
not appointed from England
the higher officers affiinted from England
and whose salaries love to be increased Ag on! 35 per cent tate Scale
zake per
option; the distinction being rather between offices appointed Way England and thore appointed locally than actin
The officer referri
to in the 4th and 5th
The amounts of increase
Λ
289
1.
belonged to the latter cler
increase
on
the 35
in that they received an her cent scale and therefor could not In compelled to contribute. Certain other officin in the former can putinted
agamist being required to
(contribute
dom, and it was left
to your discrition if sen
should see
there
fit, to Exempt
or other officers if
Say Stand have now to on being
A schrified that they had made provision for then families,
Their families
not derive
ov
that
would
any affomialt
benefit from the fund.
Here is the corrected version in HTML format:from contributing & Meri fund
3 N
Proposal organising attention
Scheme further Expressed in
...
Sup No 110 of the 19th
to the effect
of me 1890 was that!
A
then offer whom slaves
on the
should be increased 20
Scale
per cent should be com
pelled,
as a condition of receiving
that increase, to contribute
to the Fund, not that then Swart office toif 290/00
were to be allowed (35 per cent should be allowed
to contribute their
...
not at
the officers already in the
[vice
it is true
Paragraph of my Hup M231
...
340
Nr 23 w 1 Sept rögz
though not all appointed from England
So far as
not appointed from England
the higher officers appointed from England
and whose salaries were to be increased by 35 per cent Scale
have per
option; the distinction being rather between offices appointed from England and those appointed locally than ...
The officer referred
to in the 4th and 5th
The amounts of increase
...
289
1.
belonged to the latter class
increase
on
the 35
in that they received an higher cent scale and therefore could not be compelled to contribute. Certain other officers in the former class were not
against being required to
contribute
..., and it was left
to your discretion if you
should see
fit, to Exempt
or other officers if
they could now be considered to have made provision for their families,
Their families
not deriving
any
that
would
any official
benefit from the fund.
Here is the final version:from contributing & Meri fund
3 N
Proposal organising attention
Scheme further Expressed in
Sup No 110 of the 19th
to the effect
of 1890 was that
A
then offer whom slaves
on the
should be increased 20
Scale
per cent should be compelled,
as a condition of receiving
that increase, to contribute
to the Fund, not that then Swart office GR290/00
were to be allowed (35 per cent should be allowed
to contribute their
not at
the officers already in the
vice
it is true
Paragraph of my Hup M231
340
Nr 23 w 1 Sept...
though not all appointed from England
So far as
not appointed from England
the higher officers appointed from England
and whose salaries were to be increased by 35 per cent Scale
have per
option; the distinction being rather between offices appointed from England and those appointed locally than...
The officer referred
to in the 4th and 5th
The amounts of increase
289
1.
belonged to the latter class
increase
on
the 35
in that they received a higher cent scale and therefore could not be compelled to contribute. Certain other officers in the former class were not
against being required to
contribute
and it was left
to your discretion if you
should see
fit, to Exempt
or other officers if
they could now be considered to have made provision for their families,
Their families
not deriving
any official
benefit from the fund.