that the defalcations
Commenced in
my
time.
I have looked through the
evide
100 2
Am A
for
I can see the whole of the defalcations peet down to 1800 +1889 may for
ale
that is the un
to the contrary have taken place in the
first half of 1888 when
not Treasurer, and
any
I was
cinder
circumstances I should
think that it is
very improbable
that are the defalcations that.
19.
himself says
were
done
710
that if they
in the
sto no
he suggests
way
that
likely
- by the issue of false receipts- neither the Treasury
the
Audit Office could have detected them until the books
to be examined.
Carme
It must be remembered
that I was
a-
Kep
part of
the
temporary
that
occurred in 1888
recurred in
the last six
months only of
that
year.
Hort
can it be
18.
asserted that with
Vigilan
I might have
detected them. It is not even-
known in whol
Evere
Come
way they
,and Mi Nicolle himself
officer with other desti
from the
Treamry during the greater
xay
and if
therefore the frauds going on continuously for four years have cluded the vigilance of the Audit office the
toll
raison d'être of whose existence is the prevention of such occurrences
and
have alou eluded the
observation of
who no
succeeded,
long labour unders
the