I submit that it is. Rearmable out as non-not ble to single me responsible for the balancing of the Rent Roll for 1889 when by Year & 1887, 1888 + the practice prevailing for years past such balancing to my knowledge was done by me. I would have fallen Dr. L not. I commenced to be Treasurer in the middle of June 1888 & ceased to be Treasurer in the middle of January 1890, and therefore by the standard set up by the Commission neither the balancing of 1887 nor that of 1889 would have fallen on me.
One and setting this aside generally being the duty continuing if not done by me would fall on my successor with cumulative obligation. My nevertheless who are not mentioned in connection with these years. I should certainly have thought that before the balancing of a later year was taken in hand that of a previous year would be first taken in hand and in fact that the arrears should be brought up to time. However, it appears the Commission deal with each complete cycle year on year and if one was not completed to pass to the next & ascertain whether that was completed.
In this way, I am made responsible for three years while the other Treasurers who succeeded are only responsible for one year. I am made responsible.
16. In paragraph 29 of their report the Commission say that the