of neg
against the
Treasures. They refer to the late dates at which the
Treasurer
ba lanced the.
Rent Rolls and give various
dates in different years as
the
illustrating
entry. But the dates which they give are the dates of the Audit
examination and not of
Treasury balancing
balancing, which
may have been done at a time previous to the Examination, and if there
was a separate balancing
by the Treasurer they show
only
the delay
in the
Audit Office,
there are
no dates to show when
the Treasury balance
was made.
Moreover, as
what I say
bearing out
about the
balancing
it is very
significant that the Treasury ledger was posted by the Audit Office in a building remote from the
Treasury
and a
copy in the Treasury,
seeming
only
to point to the
idea that it was desired
not to leave in the hands
of the Treasury
the manipulation
of its mon
books but to
obtain an independent
check such as would be
afforded by
the result of the examination.
A Rent Roll addition
on the part of
the Treasury and
a Ledger addition on
the part of
the
Audit Office.
This is conjecture only.
...