642
conclusiveness or
the relevancy
the ar
he advances
As which
arguments
air his letter
20th street. Witho
reference to
his letter of the 24th instant I
must observes that when Government
have been stolew is al
4、Government Office it devolves on
the Officer in charges to discover
and report hous the theft committed, but I am of opinio
that, apart from the present
impossibility of stating
what
portion of the total amount misappropriated between the beginning of 1888 and the end of
misappropriated during
1889 vas
the time for which is those years
Trea
asurer, the fact
he acted
a s
for aner not.
a lovee systems of acco
of
his
not only having
•
herited
Treasury,
a co
held
Jake Andareliér
pay up.
Umber help
Is Me Jermir. In sureties
tomed bon
The
857
A i v
al
I
t
1 x 1
ccounting in but of his having.
the acting Officer on
confinctions with his substantives appointment the duties of
may
be supposed to have occupies
nearly the whole of his bine, may sufficient
properly be considered as a reason for absolving her from
pecuniary responsibility for those
Al Li
isappropriations.
those
and also
which occurred during
his tenure of Office in 1890.
It
khele Acatored
to reco
For
pu
mory ay nav
mend that the a
of the defaleations up to thounds of 1890. be written off.
.3
of
6. The