Competent

that

Manam would have appointed the Treasurer a good claim for pension. A special personal qualification have judged on account Y ...kons Hier so triated. or ther on the other hand, if the Treasurer in Sweden C Car Gruny this in absolue from pecunian, belility it amounts to an fonnciple that he admission of will only he called Cam to make good a loss g public money when he huming! has acted dishonestly of course the alteration Then Bucoval from an ffice for which he to one of lower Mr Mitchell Innes scarelly may be judged muft, Salary.

deseuer Ah pronted with suitable employment shewnin G Sui W. Robison ar suggested Except at a riduced salary; and he might his glad شها a remore & mother Sony thon Terms. Cuen to degrade win in the Corny wowed a which I do not swee that then in under the circumstance, suffirent reason for dealing out to him amming the Steen who than some 621 of the repointing for shat has sand.

On the other hand, though for Wodchann and her may make defence which weak, and ai Some points wen ridiculous, it would not, I think, a juustifiath to punish them or र्द्ध hold them pecummarily rapourth. And if they fo come an let off, it wowed a unfari In Junes alone. Lown Part of her Jane's sxcan plea that in his letter y in his the 22nd 9866 Meanh 1892 he pointed out that Le could not, with the staff at his command, properly safeguard Revenue. He founts to the fact that no rigly

However, to follow the instructions more closely and improve the text:

Competent

That

Manam would have appointed the Treasurer a good claim for pension. A special personal qualification have been judged on account. ...kons Hier so triated. On the other hand, if the Treasurer in Sweden C Car Gruny this in absolute from pecuniary, liability it amounts to a principle that he admission of will only be called upon to make good a loss of public money when he has acted dishonestly. Of course, the alteration from an office for which he was appointed to one of lower salary may be judged sufficient.

Mr. Mitchell Innes scarcely deserves to be provided with suitable employment shown by G Sui W. Robison as suggested, except at a reduced salary; and he might be glad to remain on those terms. It would be degrading to him in the Colony, which I do not think is sufficient reason for dealing out to him the severe penalty that has been suggested. On the other hand, though Wodchann and others may make a defence which is weak, and some points ridiculous, it would not, I think, be justifiable to punish them or hold them pecuniarily responsible. And if they are let off, it would be unfair to Junes alone.

Part of Jane's excuse is that in his letter of the 22nd March 1892, he pointed out that he could not, with the staff at his command, properly safeguard Revenue. He points to the fact that no...

Here is the revised version in HTML format with proper paragraphing and some corrections:

Competent

That

Manam would have appointed the Treasurer a good claim for pension. A special personal qualification have been judged on account. ...kons Hier so triated. On the other hand, if the Treasurer in Sweden C Car Gruny this in absolute from pecuniary, liability it amounts to a principle that he admission of will only be called upon to make good a loss of public money when he has acted dishonestly. Of course, the alteration from an office for which he was appointed to one of lower salary may be judged sufficient.

Mr. Mitchell Innes scarcely deserves to be provided with suitable employment shown by G Sui W. Robison as suggested, except at a reduced salary; and he might be glad to remain on those terms. It would be degrading to him in the Colony, which I do not think is sufficient reason for dealing out to him the severe penalty that has been suggested.

On the other hand, though Wodchann and others may make a defence which is weak, and some points ridiculous, it would not, I think, be justifiable to punish them or hold them pecuniarily responsible. And if they are let off, it would be unfair to Junes alone.

Part of Jane's excuse is that in his letter of the 22nd March 1892, he pointed out that he could not, with the staff at his command, properly safeguard Revenue. He points to the fact that no...

Share This Page