Page 257
The say Mi Wingfield.. 14482.92. I am Sony I had entirely forgotten it. 5 I think they ought to have referred to it in the present despatch.
The ordinance now sent is wholly different from the draft of the bill attached to 14482. The Secretary of State's despatch on this latter paper has never been answered, but I do not know that there is any necessity to call attention to it.
CPL June "The Governor should have referred to the Correspondence last year and explained the reasons for the alteration of the withdrawal of the previous Bill and the substitute in other ada. as far as I can judge the Cd" appears to carry out more naturally than the Bill the intention of the previous Wience presumablly it was not offered in May that the Wharf are salesped hene I Wait a mail and of Finance.
declared Mi Wilson Sanction the The mail hashought 17. Sanction CPL nothing Σω Ew IJane R2/6 5. at once
Z. 3. 2.90. RECE C. O. 8838 R 29 MAY 3 Government House, Hongkong, 25th April 1893, Enclosure 1. April, 1893 With six spare copies). Enclosure 2. 10th April, 1893.
My Lord Marquess, I have the honour to transmit for the signification of Her Majesty's pleasure the following Ordinance entitled:----- Wharves and Piers Ordinance *1893. 47 of 100e.
2. The customary Report by the Attorney General is annexed.
I have the honour to be, My Lord Marquess, Your most obedient humble Servant, Wm. Robinson The Marquess of Ripon K. G. etc., etc.,
Page ...
[End of Page]