DOMESTIC.
B & L (1216)---15264-6000-5-91
fice or Individual.
ming Six F.
Date.
1892
19 Jan
previous Paper.
5.75
Hong Kong
No 2656
Conduct
(Subject.)
0.0.
614
2656
REC?
REG 10 FEB 32
of Major Dempster
**
Expresses opinion that Major Dempster was not to blame with regard to the rice supplied to prisoners
(Minutes.).
M. Hanfield.
I do not quite see that this letter disposes of the charges (or even part of them) made ...
The W.O. (in 2275) asked for any further information in possession of the Dept. on the subject of the "rice Episode."
Should we refer to Sir W. des Voeux for pardon...
5.mg.11
9.1176.
this I say that Sir W. des Vœux is hardly likely to throw doubt on whether there would be much advantage in making further reference to him.
I would send copy of this, I say
fordon
I would not consult Jen?
C.P.D. 1170