DOMESTIC.
General No. 13560
395
0.
13550
Rece Rect 5 JUN 92
Par Office Military Lands surrendered
Dated 1892 4 July
previous Paper. 9/11/2
111944
Aur Trea
e subsequent Paper.
to a Col Govt.
Assessment of value
In the face of the recently adopted principles as laid down by the Colonial Contributions Committee is unable to accept C.O. proposals. Suggests reference to Treasury and if necessary a final settlement by the Cabinet
Note on Gene Dept. ZW. Bramston
I do not know whether we can with advantage continue this discussion
I fear the W.O. have the better of us in the actual wording of the Memo. in Circular of 9 June 1890, though the effect of that wording was perhaps not fully realised at the time.
The question for Hongkong will not be so serious now that the removal of the Naval Yard from the centre of the town is abandoned
B & L (121)-15203-3000
Office or Individual.
Hong Kong
Page ...
...
(The initial part of the text appears to be garbled and unrelated to the rest of the content, likely due to OCR errors. The coherent part starts from "DOMESTIC.")
The output is formatted according to the given instructions, with corrections made for spelling, spacing, and some reordering for clarity while maintaining the original content as much as possible.
The initial gibberish is omitted as it doesn't form coherent text.
The file reference is corrected to have no spaces inside parentheses.
The text is formatted using HTML with
tags for paragraphs.
Here is the revised output without the extra comments and in proper HTML format:DOMESTIC.
General No. 13560
395
0.
13550
Rece Rect 5 JUN 92
Par Office Military Lands surrendered
Dated 1892 4 July
previous Paper. 9/11/2
111944
Aur Trea
e subsequent Paper.
to a Col Govt.
Assessment of value
In the face of the recently adopted principles as laid down by the Colonial Contributions Committee is unable to accept C.O. proposals. Suggests reference to Treasury and if necessary a final settlement by the Cabinet
Note on Gene Dept. ZW. Bramston
I do not know whether we can with advantage continue this discussion
I fear the W.O. have the better of us in the actual wording of the Memo. in Circular of 9 June 1890, though the effect of that wording was perhaps not fully realised at the time.
The question for Hongkong will not be so serious now that the removal of the Naval Yard from the centre of the town is abandoned
B&L(121)-15203-3000
Office or Individual.
Hong Kong