Ler
"Jere. In supply
a
meucher msy.
vote against
reduction of
his official salary.
691. Mr Sexton asked the speaker whether the Attorney General was entitled to
vote in Supply against Amendment for the reduction of his salary.
au
W. Speaker replied, that the motion
was made to raise the question
as to the Conduct
of
the
Attorney General, which is a very
different thing from a question
undyy jo ssaubong
*uofsuva¶ 'W
which the hon. and learned mo
m
gentleman had
25 March 1889.
direct pecun
iary interest_ 334. Hausard. 6732
#
Moreover, as a
& hahhis practer,
weller
mucuster,
alous write gamin réductions
te thus Taleres, to
Thue
udu hus
polers th
are uroved in ander to saw I the conduct in
altenha
munster in querkt
In the cost of
I kory, the Opprind
*mayaang W
A
VA
be passand
Barth
In fore
the God. 1
the course
were I tent quite partised in writing of resustin
ل
gamit the winchies, the pestin was me
Eolicy nor of person /B.Z/
%
From Erskin May p. 420.
633
it is distinct bule
In the formmons it that no member who has a
Его
direct fecunian
Ar
to
interest in a question shall be allowed vote upon it: but in order to operate disqualification this interest must be immediate & personal, & not merel, of a general o remote character. On the 17 July 1811, the rule was thus explained by W Speaker Abbot: "This interest must be a direct pecumiay interest, &separatel belonging to the persons whose votes were questimed, and not in common with the rest of his Majesty's subjects, matter of state policy." This pole copimien
disallowing
wan
o an
given upon a motion a disallowin the votes of the bank directors upen
afterward
fold Coin Hill, which was
negatived without a droisin.
matter
[ Jassume in my miniiti above that Ministers salaries are a
the policy J
J.W.9.