Education
ns
undessable to adopt this profund at any rate until the forth seesitway to introduce compulsory generally and dd that ((h) the next properal, to prohibit child labour seems feasible - if as I gather it is only intended to apply to work in shops & factines
Amomestic
to me more
& not to domestic labour - which
^
latter could hardly be interfered
with.
? Ask Governer for a special this proposal which report
the See. If State would be glad to see adopted.
(c) as to the [hinese Attendance Officer
? Refer to Lord Kratifund's def.
8062/89
& the reply (4434/20)
in which the suggestion
wa
postponed till after the Census
71891
I ask Governor o consider practicabilis of
apponiting such an
now
in
V
(im 12276/86
1900
зари Jaquess.
the proposed establishment of a special
officer.
(d) I would
say nothing
about
School Fund,
Zit
A
Ido not see
than
it 20
long
as we continus
And foreint
cras be
urze
need
to
the Sot" from time to time
y this purp
to
ti Ex
to
Extend the Educational supteen
far as the finances a
allow
430
(2) As to alleged "absence of power "to forcibly detain minates of ther "Reformating"
? Ask what is meant by this
Ord. 19f 19 of
ar
the
1886 appens to give howery take opportunit
necessary
of asking for a report that Ordinance
for a report on working
off that
3. Par. 12 criticizes rather severely (as usual) Victoria Collage [see 24662]. To part of the criticisen I have referred
already.
Ifear profited much by the re-
that Dr Eitel has not
the reproof
which the Governor administered thin last January (see 30 39/92) ? Ask Govenor to report,
in the arrangeme
for Mains infameto
how
the Att arrangement mentimed in 3039/92 of associating, M. Lockhart with Dr Eitel &D. Wright
Victura in the Examination of
worked in 1892 ( ? it was
College worked in
held last month), & whether he
wan
ld recommend
ન
continuation
wouldadest.
of that joint Exam^», or the suggestion made by Dr Eital