109

Mushes case

Hent they

ume d'adore let

the only three tristements bite looked at are the

three prolished Mainter of 1862, 1870,

En

141861

Surely

ared 18.91 have told a

At that humodified 5 pp. intineriat

dürfte minutes or

in hinations in duspalikes

at the link

appoint mail it would be he will not

cestin treilly Contran to are not bo principles to it to him not again a bla The Car

Saying have it.

Jovan in the pay of The Carlicy one

from the Seculary of State, saw that if die E. O'Malley

More duni hich

I have h

443/hr inte said at Al

bears

curses be is entitled to claim thee full benefit off. it what helays

my 1/3929/92 that of the fort

i

bc hi

Are Mil

of the first 2 minutes Prepure I sexed the papers are

In moves you say what pension these bit

minutes unes fin lun - his peusin down

med

I

dating from the date of the d of Si's deferlet

Terfyning

his appointment.

M. Fairfield

857 11.3.73

Under the 16th clause of the minute of 1862 all leave with half pay only combed as fine, Heave with and pray, did not-countat.

half all;

might ht rotbetter

MINUTE PAPER.

so that ever, if you counted as full Hong Kay service the whole revied from Sept. 1879 - the date of despate informan the Gorr of Hongkery of his selection - to Teb !

yar

1880 1

daring

which he was in

t. pay

C

of Jamaica kotti catart of 3/21⁄2 Montt, &

of theft withation, for the other the month, it

is not possible to make out that he ha

9 year personable service in Hong Kong; but

include vos Jamaice service he had then over 12 years pention.athe

two points

d

Service in all,

Under the minut. of 1870,

asto the proper construction arise, - fier did

Le "remain 10 year

in the service of his

intermechali sumployer; counting from the clate

nos appartment

of the despatil notifying

the date when he began to dran. Straitipa,

he

die

her cachiding leave with a 5 pay

he did not : if he did, #4800 in clearly the

Salary on

be based

which his claim on

Hong Kap runt

If he did not the second print of construction arises, whether under clauses 647, the higher salay he received in Jamaica could possibly, be taken to increas

a

his average salary for the lost to years" it would. clearly be contrary to our coneral principles, and a great anomaly, to do so (as it would inbait the class

4 Mich Itt Jah not incercasing regulady for each year, lervice), the Minciple oft. It mul is clear that Belt-

f

Share This Page