I how many should merely be reengaged at the end of their
3 zeari terms for
terms for another term
o 3 years.
But I think we may
? Refer
this back, agami referring
to last par. of
an
desp. In 7194, as
at A above, & with reference to par. 10 of Mr. Cooper's report, in which he says that the staff which he recommends permanent one
carrying
willbe
C47
1 sufficient for
art récurrent works
t also for carrying out minor
(so-called)
Extraordinary
Worker
vi
point out that the staff question, being practically identical with the existing staff
now suffices
to carry
out some
very considerable Extraordinary such as the Reclamation
Drainage
Water & Grammar in progress-
It Works now
ศ
& Lord Risen would
Suppose
are
Therefo
that when these other
completed, a semestrat
smaller stuff world suffice
to maintain existing
works &
Execute miner new works which
begxpected to
may perhaps be required every 360 Jear;
an
and add that if the Sec. of State the further report
receiving
now called for is still unable t Sanction the transfer of the whole Existing staff to a permanent footing (as appears to be involved in hit
I Cooper's scheme), kistadship would be glad to know whether the Governor still wishes to recommend for permanent app. Mesos. Wilder More (see 71914)igh), Jam afraid of thesors. (hatham & Tasker
that by puthing them Huus one
Are
GLA
thi
by
permanent
staff be
A
of
Expiration of their present agreements next April thay (see 10883), or whether there
other officers where
are any
grade prejuizen Agreements may
the boy
in step
gradually
Введ
by step to
admitting the whole staff
later on,
terminate
whom it would be
more desirable to retaini
permanent footing,
in which
Case montiralo these men
or some of them might
be reengaged
not permanently but for a secund term of 3 years.
Sie M. Ammanny
guy. 26/10
Sülden Rotieren is a ruthless Economist (at Hrry Kory) and if he subburts Mr.