cause of this opposition to it –
(It is got a matter I think for the Law ffries)
Nothing
about th.8
1277 M. Bramstor
more has come
subject.
•
from the colony I have been looking through the papers but cannot find how the $1800n was calculated. The frentary State's despatch on 18457 45 toned
the grant of compensation
88.
I
and 8, Jauctioned
to the Whout hubdows
Wharf
Arindal
and 180000 # was insuted in the ordinance
16.01.89. a
16.07.89.
without remark
Mr. Wingfield
See page 10
without remonts & a
ai
see para
4 Pat
S
afford
i far as
I can see
29. Ang
C.PL
Certain Jursons were allowed.
ofthis dispatch - Certain Jussons,
at but &
having
"Mise
trip, lik
to Erect Whavns on the fruction ofthe Harbour_ beory I showed say
a Horeath hime to occupy the site ofthe whare, for which apparently they paid go renta Ishation may have bun their tenure it was absolutely determined by Section 6. Of thos Artimane 16 of 1889 which provides for reclamation works; white will absorb part of the harbour including the site of the whams. Itumed appear from par. 7.48 of dep. 230 of 19 Du. 18 m 18459/00 that they are to be allowse to cruch new shawns in front othe reclaimer hand, & that the marine with an paying for the Automation rooks)
holdes are to pay past of
A
1892. m. 52′
333
The cost of umning and re-rrecting the whanrs.
The and 16 of 89 accordingly provides dec. 7. A sum not
2
Saudis If 180.00 for this purpose
The Governor has introdaux a Bill Monding Machining for ascertaining
• amount of Compensation the paie & Each wharf holder, or there of these fursms claimed be heard by
persons by
Cormack against the Brodinance. The farma
Buled that this
Cinere out in Alenses as it was not a cake & where individue
Standing order of rights or interests of property are greentiarly affected = They Inotion & ark that the L.0. May be consulted on the front.
I think the Governor
was rightly advised bythe Att",
and if you concur - The fort might be that that he has sort Thought it rempary & Consult the Atty fond. a doting
Mumb
soli fint and that he is abrian by the (rown larger of this Repartment that the Governs ruling was correct
I carnet
agrer
8.30
I Wish that, whatcom
masheer been the original rights
abrend
2
Thi
the time
of the wharf holders, the hun acquired & aprement of the let-awers ratified of
rights of property in the sum met macceding $10,000 awarded to them Gewer is compensation and that
Bill providing for the afupment &
on a
individual wharf holder's where
<
Each
of that find
Bill peculiarly affecting individual sites
er interests of present-
But the Lea
Elig
CA
arride the former
state compet arride the
President of the Council-
and I should
se reples till the fute to do inform the protester
tances his lethich destr and that in there circumstances offers has but consulted the 2.0. and dres and profeen the refres any opinion correctness & she ruling. Els so ches
P.TO.