7
Lí
wik. C. B. and that the Secretary of state referred to in the Duke
Mambridge's
was
letter
of
Oct. 15th 1888 2.130f
come the Secretary of
State for War.
1.? So reply and
"send copy of Gen. Sargent's Ms. Cetter
t of an refle to W.O_ 2.7.
ша
2: ? Putty* qu9/5
or 2.
The 15h ausum suggested by Mr Johnom
is open to the objection
that it is only
an argumentation denial. If any
ausan at all is required, it Ormed te
a simple state month that had hundinud
did not säike his name int
f
thee List
Bout 3 do not binds that any
is required. He percions himself test
he has no
Evidence
or reason to suppinig
it was heed Kantipur. He has monly
asting at the anclusion by a proses If Exhaustion -8.2. as it hasn't the
the Mod brochure
x. Mr Priv Sec. has already ack ? rece
620
Duke of Cambridge it munch han time wand
Kuntoped. He might as well say
it was ich the Decke of (auchridge, it must
ist
handen the hand Mayee of
Putly 2 Cowr
amitin kans
achnownder)
5577
3.5.91
As it has been add it may be dangerous not tell min be in suting mistaker. Memine Whould roto for pitting in G.
QM MS There is
If he
5
The is really mold there is Noonanime to take any
gain.
anyuctio
I have read then new brochures"
they contain
some striking panges. On
the shoh Ishould in rispond to late the
Un Meade's P.S & pulty.
Few suppested
P. T. O
Reut may