in full,

though they

& treat them an were salary in 1875, but I do not

of bein

th

think the proposal on p. 42 desp" is the best wayout of difficulty. I would be disposed to

баз

that #boo (the pers. allowance) was in 1882 practically given partly lien of these fees, & that it in if

on to we were now

to

On second them

gible for the I would sugge to fail begard the forgot th raise the pay pro

post

than

approving $3840

Cate

f

To ch Merle

the

of these of freers as it will wing. given within the west he

another $200 beg and the #2916 [which is 35% abon the 1875 pay ] they would be quite enough.

Therefor

ml

& This is $120.

? Approve #$3120 [in lieu of begand the pa

$3240

ar

voted 7 fu

the An

salary of this offices which with their presspersmal

alle puts them

aqualit

with the $3720 of the Deputy

Land Officer [as fixed lartzear

case disallow

& in that case

of Deputy Re Sistianat denga

with whom the

officer, we compared an 16243/81

Teing.

began

over

then to

the proposed addition of $120 X. It seemed to the latter's pay", which there

seems no

sufficient reason to

raise again so Aom -

a

مسهمة جدا

That

21

would seem & have been mum salam

properly described as

of Portuguese Translater, not

personal allowance of Messager Jar. 17 The Ecclesiastical Dept has

2000

been disposed of in a separate deaf? I cut down by about $ par 18. The increased votes in

Education dept should be

164

approved? I am glad that the & presumab are eaming, Schools

deserving larzer grants:

par. 19 ? Approve the increases fo

Medical Dept.

fear necessary

ab

La in

S

which

are

Murgh this

Dept. has a knack of growing

Every gear.

Havl

par. 20/21,2 Magistracy & Police. In

Small increases here was

approved?

par. 23

&que. 4

10025/89 Jay Z Defe Land offier

(5953/03)

should be equ

Sanction allowance to the Messenger Deputy Regis referred to an p. 44 of desf" which

1

Sanitary Superintendent.

This officer

In 1883, on

wa

appointed

salary of $2640; arise to $3000,

was given in 189

and under the general

scheme of increases in 1891 was

raised to $3240. As again

I pointed out in my mouth (f. 10 ]

~on 1123/90-1,

$3240 was less

Share This Page