pay + half his superior's pay, hit M. Sangster IM. Shepherd

quarter of the batter. mly drew a

it was a case

2-

than

In fact Shay;

of distribution

sily to amoy

ffices, of a kind in

Lee 16202

according

to muiter

principle like to those allowable

As to this however we

Mauritius

2317:188 mügtet.

? Observe that apply the Schedule Enclosed in 560 cm in

in error in stating that apparents W. Shepherd drew half the Registins since this despatch says

paz,

hamedly says

half pas

he divided this

with M-Sangster

a

laid

? adhere to decon ruling down in desp" on 16202, that fol. Reg" 108 and applies to two separate & distinct offices. different defti

? Add that of any excess Kirshed) bemade Tapahsale it

work rabhar under the

Warling Crammstances (ond Ramsey may

Jopee

itamed a hand if

be excused the refund of

the amount overdrawn,

though it was

only paid to

him subject to see. Male;

in view

approval, get

the Jolong he might

in

59

of precessuti

have had

ground for anticipating

make lin 2-freed.

57

I find that this been

Wend

amended by 8.13/2) god. 36071891 paned the this letter was written by Caw. Hastings

that

it would not be disallowed, so that the refund would 'be

rather hard on

and

Say

kiin,

that D.OS.

was right

in declining to treat 2.4's as in separate parts suic

raz

the post was

offered to X

accepted by him on

ana

of

lump sum,

782640

Is the question

his predecessors smolemment.

is not in point, W. H.

having drawn fees

never having

himself

das to par g of his recond letter,

ask why Ord. referred

to has not get been amended in accordance with desp. in 1726790 tsay that it is presumed that

in the meantime M. H. han

begu

on any

9/2. not again hunt

Exam? Boar] 8u9.37l.

at our 27 69. 2.92 L. PL. 3. Fiv 69.2.92

Share This Page