Marriages in articulo meshes that in feior with world be revoked by the mariage, & yet that there wouldnt
Io time to miaka i mesone,
AM
I have not heard wayed before. Is any
a fuir
argument which
any reservation in
favor oft will made in the Alpinal laws of Jamaica Mawriting or Layern? I closed thank ast-
There is no
ལ
alteratio
hway, harwar, to decide whether should hands at Hay Komy upon they, point; & I thank
it would be well to impiin whether
I have looked
at 12657/64
Queen's Adv.
partias", and therefor
" no legal effect
212
it has whatever Excepti
and therefore it does not in such
a case revoke
་་
prin will? I feel come doubt whether this in 9931/64
the right reading of the Ceylon Law, Showing
prin migin of the
but s. 6 of Trinidad Law 13 of 1865 Reglen Law 8065, but they anyhow, I think, saver in wills do not clearly
in cases of marriages in articulo xplain the bjects of the moster, for it declares that
ཉཡ
question of
5.4
this kind her arvien in kore whomies or in this
Country.
The first dejection raised of the former don emy forcible
not chrike me u ve
mmake
W. Braustin
ML
Mai
Neither the Mauritius Law (Od. 250/18825.16) nor the Jamaica Law (no. 15/18795.29) any reservation in favor of prior wills; but the Ceylon Ard. 8 of 1865, 5.4(2) provides that "such marriage shall have no legal effect, except that of preventing romarriage of Either of the said parties with any other person; until the same shall be acknowledged by the parties before thin Registrar in this manner herein prescribed" Jimagine that if the sick person who is thus married does not recover, Inamage is never acknowleszed by the
povisões in
such marringer shall "be and be deemed to be totally void and have
be told to Effect
as a marriage in law" Shall then Hongtay follow the wording wither of Ceylon
20
or the Trinidad Kaw
?
shall we first ack Jamaica & Mauritius whether the difficulty. has arisen in Either of those Colonies?
3.4.7.13/11
Is it not meant
I to not find in the Ceylon Law
Ceylon Law any provision for acknwhitz- 4be provided twin the latter, mont before the Rejistar as herein Irescribed " _ But I think
IN. IT huom rightly appschands the effect of the law-
part of 5.4(2)
gu). 14/11
With
Keition the Cengton or the Trinidad Language is very good, on both
too wide, for they
A-
to bastavise a posthumums child which can scarcely be intended. And be may have to frame a Clause - Bout muamshil. greiti to Jammien Mauritius JA.13/11
7.
and
host ask Jamain & Hamitin
گرا
1