The only questions doubt that I should
have in appleging
present
This posisciple to this case and to that in 16561,
Micas of
ĥ Whether
the Assistant Harbour
Haunter and the Deputy Supersistendent
Police were woke
marily
with a
not created
a view of meeting this
Contingency and than whether there
in during the absence of one officer
unnch
very
love them for the
remaining officer & do win which case
that the public should receive the
3
مسلات
Cridles,v
X but not
(unami-
monall
зия
در باید هسته
with 161GL
ĥ hinsist
of their wor
Raperd te pay.
to merits. The
It is pay think back case
Harald to trated
question in one on which the experience
of the different defertument would
be useful. 24
ah
6 Sept
Ther from
Arcntain by vectal sugning Death without unding this round fra
long series
of
strays & conflicting personal
M. Meade 1 679
I have ascertained by verbal
19579
18
folie authority
& must be accepted as four policy. Rui
Enquiry
appear
that
Mere
to be no rulings contrary Kaylin303 19579
to that of one desf
X
4
the general opinion in the Office
to be decidedly in favour
the reading of (ok. Reg. 108 there laid down.
By then
? Proceed as proposed in my first mininte sinquiri
alleged case at the Thaits
See also 16561
8u1579
If the above view is adopted
it must be around that the
straughts of each Departement is not
as to provide for
the performance of an absent menator duties without
serious catro labour
Or othe
Labour falling
are outsider month
member/, and
the reply
this should be stated him the
Stoug Komp.. 5 sep
Weite er poparden wir h
·lapsnių talp salary
haid for our
F