contending
مد
persistent. Wille ajard to the second point the O.A.G. says nothing but the Bishop contends to urge the withdrawal of the receipt for the Registration License, pointing out that it is Not regarded by the Indian Marriage Act I of 1865 which is in force in the Straits settlements, and that under the ... Ordinance s of 1850 merely got where the intervention of the Registrar would be required when the parties clerk to be married before him.
Subject to avoid the Bishop does not maintain that the parties proper it What to objects to in the receipt the Registrar receives for an Ecclesiastical Marriage
which he alleges does not exist. in India or the Straits
Nr2/8
and Cayton.
+
law
Both them Whether
fines & Common law shank. p. 44 y Eastern.
121
The Registrar does not give a license to the persons that certain notice to firm, and the Registrar's certificate is proof that the law has been Complied with. It is in no sense a license. To reply
As to
Marriages in articulo mortis I should be Disinclined to accept the view of the Event Govr that no Chary is required - Anything is so small that on Governor's permission can be obtained at short notice, my impression is that this consideration influenced me when I drew the act"
71875-
M.679
J
August Robert any 5
do not understand the special section which after the felt "on social & moral ground"
Н. Сител
against a law which
prevails in
Jamaica, Mauritory
in
deciding upon this point & 'I would ask to
the ground. Is to the west proceed as proposed
(Jan. 1577)
zes:see
A
4 of
$16
Ford. 8 of 1865
Ju/1015