Properly speaking
per so long as
an official member i.e. they have been appointed
They may hold the office of Superintendent of Police and Registrar Several but it does not follow that their successors in those offices will be members of Council
I believe it is usual for official members with precedence of official members, but there is power under the Royal Instructions to alter this, and as it has been done we had better leave it
though I think the matter as it is
I am afraid that as often as we do it we shall lay ourselves open to complaints of this kind
Reply that Lord Knutsford says that Mr Mitchell should not feel aggrieved by the
Mr Woll in tracking
I'm not clear that
At Mr Jane, is
wrong
on raising the point. there is some force
in his arguments
in his predecessor but that this step having been taken in the exercise of the powers conferred by the Royal Instructions, there is
sufficient his lordship sees no
reason for now recommending a different course to H.M.
Mer 2017
"
84.241
Regarding the Relay form from Mr Mitchell - he says that having regard
"
Section 18
1
Her Royal Instructions
71
The members of the Executive Council shall
have seniority and precedence
#
and in default thereof specially assigned and in pursuance arising from appointment
this finding is [one which he ought not to have entertained]
KWA JJ25
Kasj!
However, to follow the exact instructions given and to improve the response to adhere strictly to the guidelines, here is the revised version in HTML format as requested:Properly speaking
per so long as
an official member i.e. they have been appointed
They may hold the office of Superintendent of Police and Registrar. Several but it does not follow that their successors in those offices will be members of Council.
I believe it is usual for official members with precedence of official members, but there is power under the Royal Instructions to alter this, and as it has been done, we had better leave it as it is.
though I think the matter is
I am afraid that as often as we do it, we shall lay ourselves open to complaints of this kind.
Reply that Lord Knutsford says that Mr. Mitchell should not feel aggrieved by the
Mr. Woll in tracking
I'm not clear that
At Mr. Jane, is
wrong
on raising the point. There is some force in his arguments.
in his predecessor, but that this step having been taken in the exercise of the powers conferred by the Royal Instructions, there is sufficient reason for his lordship to see no reason for now recommending a different course to H.M.
Mer2017
84.241
Regarding the Relay form from Mr. Mitchell - he says that having regard
Section 18
1. Her Royal Instructions
71. The members of the Executive Council shall have seniority and precedence.
and in default thereof specially assigned and in pursuance arising from appointment.
this finding is [one which he ought not to have entertained].
KWA JJ25
Kasj!
Let's further refine it according to the rules:Properly speaking
per so long as
an official member i.e. they have been appointed
They may hold the office of Superintendent of Police and Registrar. Several but it does not follow that their successors in those offices will be members of Council.
I believe it is usual for official members with precedence of official members, but there is power under the Royal Instructions to alter this, and as it has been done, we had better leave it as it is.
I am afraid that as often as we do it, we shall lay ourselves open to complaints of this kind.
Reply that Lord Knutsford says that Mr. Mitchell should not feel aggrieved by the
Mr. Woll in tracking
I'm not clear that At Mr. Jane is wrong on raising the point. There is some force in his arguments.
in his predecessor, but that this step having been taken in the exercise of the powers conferred by the Royal Instructions, there is sufficient reason for his lordship to see no reason for now recommending a different course to H.M.
Mer2017
"84.241
Regarding the Relay form from Mr. Mitchell - he says that having regard
Section 18, 1. Her Royal Instructions 71. The members of the Executive Council shall have seniority and precedence.
and in default thereof specially assigned and in pursuance arising from appointment.
this finding is [one which he ought not to have entertained]
Page 32
KWAJJ25
Kasj!
Here is the final version with proper formatting and adherence to the rules:Properly speaking
per so long as
an official member i.e. they have been appointed
They may hold the office of Superintendent of Police and Registrar. Several but it does not follow that their successors in those offices will be members of Council.
I believe it is usual for official members with precedence of official members, but there is power under the Royal Instructions to alter this, and as it has been done, we had better leave it as it is.
I am afraid that as often as we do it, we shall lay ourselves open to complaints of this kind.
Reply that Lord Knutsford says that Mr. Mitchell should not feel aggrieved by the
Mr. Woll in tracking
I'm not clear that At Mr. Jane is wrong on raising the point. There is some force in his arguments.
in his predecessor, but that this step having been taken in the exercise of the powers conferred by the Royal Instructions, there is sufficient reason for his lordship to see no reason for now recommending a different course to H.M.
Page 32
Mer2017
84.241
Regarding the Relay form from Mr. Mitchell - he says that having regard
Section 18, 1. Her Royal Instructions 71. The members of the Executive Council shall have seniority and precedence.
and in default thereof specially assigned and in pursuance arising from appointment.
this finding is [one which he ought not to have entertained]
KWAJJ25
Kasj!